БОРОДИН: В средней Азии


The Architects of Our Demise

By Cocky Caucasian

Apr 12, 2016

Many aspects of the cultural degradation of Western civilization have been discussed ad nauseam within the alt-right—race, gender, sexuality, family norms, et cetera. But there is one crucial aspect which often goes ignored; the complete degradation of our artistic and architectural standards as a people.
It used to be that you could distinguish the nationality of a building or series of buildings just by looking at them. That’s a Portuguese church, you could say. Or an Italian village. Or a German palace. Or a Dutch residential street abutting a canal. Nowadays, it’s the same bland, boring, soulless garbage being built across the Western world, indistinguishable from one country to the next. Monstrosities of concrete, glass, and ugliness.

You can compare the photographs of what major German cities looked like before the Second World War, and what they look like now. The contrast is sobering—and I have no doubt that the loss of beautiful urban architecture is a major contributing factor toward the cultural anomie and militant levels of cucking that are taking place in German cities today. At least in a city like Paris, if you just ignore what the majority of the people look like, you can still picture what the city itself looked like back when France was truly French, because the architecture is still there. In Hamburg or Dortmund, there is nothing to distinguish the architecture as German in any way, shape or form. You basically have to travel to a smaller city like Heidelberg or Bamberg to see what the real Germany looked like.

The Second World War had many casualties, but perhaps chief among them was aesthetics. Part of the reason was functional—the baby boom in Europe and the European diaspora, combined with the need to rebuild certain destroyed parts of Europe efficiently to accommodate all the now-homeless people. But there was also an ideological bent to it. Hitler admired classical art and architecture, so into the trash they go. Beautiful art and architecture suddenly represented the exact form of hateful, prejudiced ethnonationalism that Hitler stood for, and suddenly the very type of architecture that had made up the now-destroyed prewar Dresden now became symbolic of Hitler’s ideology in and of itself, even though it predated his birth by hundreds of years. Modernist artists and architects started decrying the old and bringing in the (((new))), panning anything that reflected a beautiful or traditional aesthetic as kitschy and cliché and played-out. Of course, by this point we’ve had modernist art and architecture for long enough that it has become a tired cliché in and of itself, but as with everything else, the hypocrisy and inconsistency of Cultural Marxism in this area eludes them too.

This boring, soulless architecture of the post-WW2 era goes beyond the point of mere utilitarianism, and often takes pride in being aggressively ugly. No greater proof of this can be seen than in the example of the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, a beautiful early-20th century beaux-arts building that was deliberately adulterated with a horrendous jagged glass cubist addition called the Michael Lee-Chin Crystal in 2007. Mere blocks away, a similar architectural rape is being done to the majestic gothic revival One Spadina Crescent building of the University of Toronto.

In the British city of Leicester, now one of the least white municipalities in the entire country, the glorious tall Tudor-style buildings surrounding the central clock tower square were demolished in 1973 to build an ugly generic shopping mall. I can’t help but wonder if this surrender of the city’s architectural heritage to the bland forces of modernism helped make their capitulation of their ethnic heritage go through all the more smoothly.
Among the major names that advanced modernist architecture, you will of course find plenty of echo: (((((Joseph Eichler))))), (((((Erich Mendelsohn))))), (((((Arne Jacobsen))))), (((((Bruno Taut))))), (((((Oscar Niemeyer))))), and (((((Richard Neutra))))).

A major ideological aim of this ugly, bland, soulless architecture is to promote globalism by entrenching the notion of sameness across the Western world. You see a picture of one of these hideous boring buildings, and it could be in Germany or Canada or Russia or a million other places. You see a picture of a 17th-century Flemish building with a Flemish gable rooftop, and you know that building is in Flanders (or you may guess the Netherlands, but either way, close enough).

Having a unique style of national architecture is meant to engender a sense of national pride and identity in the people who live in these cities and towns and see the architecture every day, as they commute to and from work, or walk to the grocery store, or drive to their friend’s house. When you see the same boring generic buildings everywhere, you lack the sense of pride that would make you give a damn about seeing the same boring generic people everywhere (i.e. the Star Wars cantina-esque mix of different races commonly visible in any major Western city nowadays, making the people of every city in every nation look increasingly indistinguishable from the next).

A country that doesn’t take pride in the way that its buildings look will never take pride in the way its people look. Losing pride in the architectural identity of a nation will contribute to a loss of pride in the nation itself. Which is exactly, of course, what the Cultural Marxists want. As we seek to reinvigorate this fallen civilization we live in, we on the alt-right need to look into restoring our nations, not only in terms of their people but also in terms of the architecture that surrounds us. If we lose these aesthetic reminders of where our cultural pride comes from, then it will be far easier for us to forget who we are.


Zero Tolerance: Why Aren't White Nationalists and Jewish Nationalists Fellow Travelers?

By Auschwitz Soccer Ref

Apr 11, 2016

Since its inception, the alt-right has been continually wracked by intense debates of whether or not the (((traditional enemies of the White Man))) have a place in our movement. The fact that this issue, which is actually very simple, is still debated should be cause for some concern, as if we can’t agree on this issue then what hope do we have when it comes to agreeing on much more complex issues such as economics, government, or religion? Let’s ask ourselves a simple question: has letting Jews into any organization, political party, religious institution, nation, or empire ever resulted in something beneficial to us? Perhaps a better question is, what good can possibly come of it?

Subversion by Jews and their servants is still the single biggest threat to the cohesion and effectiveness of the alt-right, and not by those who hide their Jewish identity, but those who wear it on their sleeve and come to us as fellow nationalists fighting against a common Islamic or leftist threat. These are the most dangerous and slippery infiltrators because they use rhetoric that specifically appeals to us while diverting our energies to something only ever ends up benefiting Jews. We see this subversion working all too effectively on naïve and gullible (purple-pilled) counter-jihadist Whites, the types who read fjordman and watch Pat Condell’s inane rants on Youtube. These shills and liars like Condell take the ongoing destruction of Europe and present it as an act of civilizational senility as opposed to a planned and coordinated Jewish attack on the civilization they’ve despised and conspired against for thousands of years. Pat Condell may dislike Islam and leftists, but he reserves his truly vicious hatred for “anti-semites,” making him every bit of an enemy of Europe as Barbara Lerner Spectre, Anetta Kahane, or Tim Wise. While the latter are overt in their hatred of Whites, it’s shabbos goyim like Condell who make such destructive Jewish power possible.

Given this, there’s only one answer to the question of whether Jews and philosemites have any place in the alt right: no. Anyone who self-identifies as a Jew or anyone who makes excuses for a continued Jewish presence in White homelands should be unapologetically excluded from this movement, and none of these people should ever be allowed to speak at alt right conferences no matter how pro-White they may seem. We need to understand three cold, hard facts about how our goals differ from Jewish goals, with an emphasis on what’s happening in Europe right now:

Jews have nothing whatsoever to gain from supporting European nationalism.If Europe goes nationalist, jews will eventually be rooted out as the cause of Europe’s misery and will be deported along with their semitic Muslim brethren, just as they were in Spain and other regions throughout Western history.There is therefore no reason to assume that a Jew is being honest when he or she talks about defending Europe.There has never in history been an example of jews selling out their own interests for ours, or anyone else’s for that matter, and they’re not going to start now.

Much of Europe’s spiritual malaise revolves around the unblinking acceptance of the Allies’ WWII narrative and the alleged Shoahcost by Germany. Jews will never oppose this narrative in large numbers, as they gain too much money and sympathy from it. As Jews will always defend their WW2 narrative no matter how preposterous their claims are, and as long as they use this narrative to justify Europe “going into multicultural mode,” Jews are not capable of being dependable allies in this struggle.

Jews are not White and we don’t need them.They have nothing to offer us.Letting Jews into this movement and even parading them around as courageous defenders of “the West” (such as Richard Spencer does with Paul Gottfried and Jared Taylor does with a number of them) therefore makes as much as sense as doing the same with an African or Arab. It makes us look weak, as if we can’t possibly prevail without the wisdom of the Levant. If the Jew in question somehow happens to be an actual ally (but going back to the first point, why would they even want to be allies?), then he or she will simply have to understand why it is we cannot trust them, given their tribe’s long history of subversion and pitiless back-stabbing.

This movement is about us, not them. If they are offended by us excluding them, that’s fine. They can be offended. We believe in what benefits Whites, not Jews, and there is no reason for us to take their delicate feelings into account. They sure as hell don’t care about our feelings, nor do they have serious debates among themselves as to whether Whites should have any role in their movements. How silly would it have been for the Zionists to devote time and effort into debating whether they should support European nationalism in the 19th Century? To this day, hyper-nationalist Israel remains one the biggest enemies of European and even American nationalism. This is because Jews are not opponents in a friendly game of chess, but remorseless enemies who seek the destruction of the people they hate, which is us.

We will not stand with Israel because Israel will not stand with us. Since when is an enemy with a powerful ethnostate an ally? The slow-witted conservatives of the counter-jihad movement say we can learn much from Israel. Yes, we can. We can learn that Jews enjoy burning women and children to death with white phosphorus while stating that their enemies aren’t a “real people.” Sound familiar? They say the same thing about Whites, whether we’re in America or Germany. And yes, from Israel’s immigration laws and security apparatus we can learn how to effectively keep racial undesirables out of our nations… especially Jews. Put frankly, anyone who stands with Israel stands against the interests of Whites.

As long as Jews are in a position of power superior to ours, we can’t afford to let them have any say in the alt-right. If we ever get the upper hand, then we will have the freedom to sort out the good Jews from the bad ones, or more accurately, the harmless ones from the destructive ones. Until then we are in no position to say “yes” to these people, not after 2000 years of non-stop treachery and backstabbing from them. Ultimately, all Jews must be seen as diaspora Israelis. They are no longer rootless nomads, but rather imperialists exercising dominion over our nations from their Middle Eastern ethno-state. They are not our allies and never will be, and if the alt-right cannot flatly and unapologetically say “no” to Jews, then we might as well just become mainstream conservatives.


President Camacho:

Seeing as I’m from the future and I’ve seen it all, and I see how the shit came out. Listen. Y’all don’t need to worry about climate change. What you need to worry about is we running out of White people. We running out.

Let me tell you something. In about 500 years. Y’all done went to bonkers. Y’all done got on planes, you flew to different places. The White Flight. There ain’t nowhere else to go! You done head out in the mountaintops, you done went underground. We, let me tell you something: there’s a White people shortage. That’s gonna happen.

You White people been worrying so much about what’s in danger to spotted owls…the fucking…the fucking deer and the last bit of rabbit that’s running around, the jack rabbits. Can’t let us shoot the coyotes. And y’all didn’t realize yo ass was in danger. Check it out right now. Look, you used to be blonde, family was blonde, now you running around the family looking like…like…like Chico!

Let me tell you something. It’s all getting mixed together player. We all one family, come on out of hiding. Man, we got to save the White people, that’s why I have a 5% stake in the Washington Whiteskins. That’s right.”

What I’m trying to say is: preserve yourself, White people. You special. I’m getting choked up over this shit.”

So, I came back, from the future, to let you know that this shit is happening. You’re running out of time.




Search form
Latest Journals
Latest comments
Monthly archive
Friend Request Form

Want to be friends with this user.